CDMO Performance Platform

One platform. Two operating models.

CDMO Performance serves both sides of the pharmaceutical manufacturing partnership — internal CDMOs running the Order to Release lifecycle, and sponsors governing their external manufacturing network. Same commitment to patients. Same operating discipline. Different vantage point.

Patient First · Right First Time · On Time · Best-in-Class Client Experience

Which platform are you looking for?

Select your operating model. Both platforms share the same PSQDC scorecard framework, stage-gate backbone, and Power BI performance intelligence layer — adapted to your role in the partnership.

Internal CDMO

Order to Release
Lifecycle Management

You are the CDMO. This is your operational backbone — from proposal win strategy through demand planning, supply planning, tech transfer, manufacturing campaign, batch release, and shipment. On-time execution. Right-first-time outcomes. Best-in-class client experience.

Proposal→ Demand Plan→ Supply Plan→ Tech Transfer→ Manufacturing→ Release→ Shipment + Invoice

Delivers

  • End-to-end OTR framework with IPO architecture per phase
  • Integrated Product Team (IPT) model + governance structure
  • PSQDC KPI scorecard with thresholds and escalation rules
  • CDMO Prioritization Framework: Patient · Client · Employee · Community · Shareholder
  • Maturity assessment: 7 stages, radar scorecard, gap report
  • Drug development phase gate process + timeline
  • Resourcing allocation model + capacity planning
Explore Order to Release →
Sponsor / Client Side

External Manufacturing
Management System

You are the sponsor. This is your oversight model — selecting, governing, transferring to, and managing CDMO/CMO partnerships. Stage-gated lifecycle management, PSQDC scorecards, and Power BI WPI visibility across your entire external manufacturing network.

Strategy→ CDMO Selection→ Contract + Governance→ Tech Transfer→ Campaign→ Release→ Lifecycle Review

Delivers

  • G0–G6 stage-gate framework with domain-mapped outputs per gate
  • PSQDC scorecard per CDMO + consolidated sponsor WPI
  • Power BI WPI dashboard: drill from network → CDMO → KPI → recovery action
  • Partner selection due diligence and risk-adjusted scoring
  • Maturity assessment: 6 areas, radar scorecard, implementation roadmap
  • Recovery-to-target governance: owners, due dates, escalation logic
Explore External Manufacturing →

Shared Foundation

One framework. Both sides of the partnership.

Whether you are running the manufacturing or governing the partner, CDMO Performance is built on the same PSQDC framework, the same patient-first prioritization logic, and the same performance intelligence architecture — adapted to your role in the lifecycle.

1
Patient
Every action anchored in patient safety and therapeutic access
2
Client
Proactive alignment, transparency, and delivery discipline
3
Employee
Culture of ownership, clarity, and continuous improvement
4
Community
Responsible manufacturing, compliance, and social commitment
5
Shareholder
Value earned through excellence in serving the first four
PSQDC
Scorecard Framework
People · Safety · Quality · Delivery · Cost · Innovation — one common language for performance, regardless of which side of the partnership you occupy.
Stage Gate
Go / No-Go Governance
OTR uses 7 stages from proposal to close. External manufacturing uses G0–G6 from strategy through lifecycle review. Both prevent forward momentum without readiness.
Power BI WPI
Performance Intelligence
Weighted Performance Index — from site-level scorecard to program-level dashboard. Trend visibility, recovery-to-target actions, and ownership at every level.
Maturity Model
Assessment + Roadmap
Complimentary self-assessment for both tracks. Radar scorecard shows current vs. target. Prioritized roadmap shows what to build first to accelerate the most.

Proven In Practice

What gets installed. What changes.

CDMO Performance frameworks have been deployed in high-complexity pharmaceutical manufacturing environments — accelerating maturity, reducing late surprises, and building the client delivery discipline that competitive CDMOs and disciplined sponsors require.

Internal CDMO · Order to Release

End-to-End OTR Framework Install

Client delivery depended on many handoffs across proposal, onboarding, production, release, and shipment. End-to-end OTR framework, KPI cascade, client delivery governance, and cross-functional risk review installed. Greater transparency, fewer late surprises, better alignment between operations, quality, supply chain, and client-facing teams.

Internal CDMO · Manufacturing Performance

PSQDC Scorecard + Tiered Review

KPI dashboards existed but performance signals did not consistently translate into action. Integrated KPI architecture, Tier 1–3 escalation, threshold logic, owner assignment, and insight-to-action workflow deployed. Faster decisions, better visibility, more disciplined escalation, and a clearer path from metric to countermeasure.

Sponsor · External Manufacturing

External Manufacturing Governance

Sponsor oversight of CDMO partnerships lacked structured stage gates, scorecard visibility, and escalation discipline. Stage-gated external manufacturing framework deployed with PSQDC scorecards per CDMO, consolidated WPI, recovery-to-target governance, and monthly performance review routines. Predictable partner performance and early risk identification.

Start with a maturity assessment — or explore the framework.

Both tracks have a complimentary ~15-minute self-assessment. Score your current state, see your gap on a radar chart, and get a prioritized implementation roadmap. Or explore the full framework and decide where to start.

OTR Maturity Assessment → External Manufacturing Assessment → Discuss Your Scope